We give up to understand all the other people’s frustrations and mazelas from the moment where we learn unfastening in them of what it does not belong in them and that, honest, never belonged in them. We give up wanting for us a sincere and true love because we understand that we them remaining portions and the crumbs were only given, and these, for nobody will serve, at any moment of the life. Because love, and only LOVE (capital) donated of soul and heart, without second or other intentions that to not of wanting the good it of the other Only the love of wanting the good is that it adds and it makes to grow. Except of this, another feeling is any. Therefore we give up! Because we understand that the absence will not be so sensible due the presence to have heavy excessively at some moment of the life. if weighed is because she was being extreme, without filling the good spaces, transforming into arrest the feelings that would have to be free. does not exist love that has taken a heart for the captivities, the bilges, and there, adds sentimental value it. When this occurs it is because never it had love, is because the feeling if it resigned and if it prostrou, and, finally, it was suffocated and it silenced. We give up to hear this feeling because we wanted LOVE But we receive what it agreed to the others, that is, remaining portions and crumbs


Pensioner coando mine and the other people’s bag, the ear, the thought. The thought more mine of what the other people’s one. Another day reading Scrates, in data moment of its speech, says: more or less this: the poets like its poetries, or only admire its poetical compositions. At the moment I was puto and as not taste of Scrates, I only read to know its thoughts, that you unite are questionable, therefore nothing wrote, nothing left written, strange! Plato, its disciple, was who wrote saying that Scrates said. we know any fact, history, event, counted for that the fact did not live, that heard and this reproducing, already comes with distortions. Its veracity depends very on the personality, the character, the formation of who to this repassing, therefore, let us agree, is impossible even though to repass faithful any witnessed fact to that they had not witnessed it and two people who had witnessed fact the same count, them on different details, and the details and that they make all difference, mainly when these try to reproduce to know, knowledge heard of others, and the more time if they pass, more details if they lose to if trying to register them in the writing. Some scholars of the old philosophies, for times, say that Scrates and Plato if confuse. In certain texts he is difficult to know where he starts the Scrates and he finishes the Plato, and vice he turns.

But coming back what Scrates spoke on the poets. I at least, do not know no poetry mine nor of any poet. If to ask for to me to recite one alone poetry mine, I will not know to say it! Therefore, only taste of the moment of the creation of the poem, the text! Type this that now I write. While I write, I am excited, adrenalin in the last one. I do not write for me. It has! Scrates also spoke, thinks that the poets write exactly for itself.

It will be! Scrates spoke for the walls, for he himself! I am certain, I write trying to share lived experiences. Now, what we can affirm is that who less necessary of teachings is the ones that look more them. The ones that more they need, they pass far of, two lines more than written, already they mutter, ' ' it has much word there, very great this livro' '. But Scrates was valid. Taste of Democritus, says: ' ' the sun visits the latrine and not if contamina' '. Wise wisdom, difficult to obtain this behavior, but not impossible, says that Jesus Christ was this sun!